When analyzing self-funded employer claims, benefits, or provider networks, the key question is often: Are we overpaying for drugs? While it's not always possible to answer definitively, price transparency regulations and the right tools now offer a rare window into this otherwise opaque space.
This blog walks through a step-by-step methodology using Gigasheet to analyze negotiated drug rates between payers and providers. With the right filters and datasets, you can turn massive machine-readable files into actionable insights on prescription drug costs, helping contain spend, steer care, and improve contracting strategies.
Consultants, benefits managers, and employers all play critical roles in managing healthcare costs. Historically, a lack of visibility into actual reimbursement rates has been a major barrier to optimizing drug spend. Without transparency, it's hard to:
Now that insurers are required to publish negotiated rates, it's finally possible to access this data. Gigasheet helps make the process fast and manageable.
Under the Transparency in Coverage (TiC) rule, insurers must publish machine-readable files (MRFs) each month listing their in-network negotiated rates with every provider. These files include pricing for procedures, office visits, and—increasingly important—prescription drugs administered in clinical settings.
The challenges:
Gigasheet's platform for Price Transparency automatically flattens and processes these files, turning them into a spreadsheet-like interface. We also enrich each record with the National Provider Identifier (NPI) registry, adding provider names, types, and locations. (And we already have a catalog of terabytes of MRFs that are preprocessed and ready for analysis!) This transformation eliminates the need for custom code or infrastructure and makes the data immediately explorable in an intuitive interface.
To evaluate whether a negotiated commercial rate is high or low, we need a benchmark. Medicare provides the most widely accepted baseline.
The CMS Average Sales Price (ASP) file lists pricing for **Medicare Part B drugs, **typically infusions and injectable therapies. Updated quarterly, it includes 942 drugs along with:
You can access the CMS ASP file directly or explore the data in Gigasheet.
Joining this file into our workflow gives us the context needed to compare negotiated rates against a public standard.
Once the MRF is loaded, use Gigasheet’s Filter by Sheet feature to isolate drug-specific rows. We prefilter using the 942 HCPCS codes from the CMS ASP file to eliminate unrelated procedures and services.
This narrows the scope and allows you to:
From there, you can filter the dataset further by specific providers, facility types, or regional markets. For example:
This lets you zero in on the actual prices relevant to your population.
The end result is a transparent view into how different providers are reimbursed for the same drugs. Each row shows:
This allows you to:
For Consultants:
For Self-Insured Employers:
For Life Sciences and Market Access:
This analysis would typically require:
Gigasheet removes all of that complexity. With a simple UI, you can:
Drug cost variation is no longer hidden. With price transparency data and the right tools, consultants, benefits teams, and employers can finally get visibility into what they’re paying, and why. Gigasheet turns this data into insight, without needing to build or maintain a data pipeline.
Have a use case in mind or want to run this analysis with your own MRFs? Reach out to our team.